![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Michigan Child Death Review Program
|
|
![]() |
|||
|
* Team
Coordinator * A child death review team is not a new official organization. The authority and responsibility of participating agencies do not change. Rather, teams enable various disciplines to come to the same table on a regular basis and pool their expertise to better understand and take action on child deaths in their jurisdictions.
A team coordinator is selected at the organizational meeting prior to the first review meeting. The team coordinator, who can be any one of the team members, serves at the discretion of the team. Teams can decide to rotate the position. Team coordinator duties:
Member Designees and Meeting Attendance Team members can designate another representative of their agency to replace them at meetings they are unable to attend. Team members must recognize the importance of regular attendance as a means of sharing the expertise and knowledge for which they were recruited. Team members who consistently miss meetings should be replaced. The team coordinator should contact their agency to designate other qualified individuals.
Public Act 167 of 1997 stipulates that child death review teams have a core team membership that includes:
Additional team membership depends on community resources and needs. It is recommended that a team also include:
Other team members may include neonatologists and representatives from the clergy, funeral homes, child advocacy centers, SIDS professional support services, community foundation officers and tribal councils. Because agencies have special programs that relate to team activities, it may be appropriate to have more than one agency representative on a team. Teams may designate ad hoc members. Because ad hoc members are not permanent, they do not regularly receive team notices. They attend meetings only when they have been directly involved in a case scheduled for review or to provide information on team related activities. Ad Hoc members provide valuable information without increasing the number of permanent team members. They may be child protective service workers involved in a specific case, law enforcement officers from a police agency that handled a case, or a child advocate who worked with a family.
|
|||